![]()
The latest recommendations come as universities finalise their plans for the 2020-21 academic year, with most putting lectures online and holding seminar groups in much larger rooms or smaller groups to enable students to socially distance. “This could include students on practice-based programmes and programmes requiring specialised equipment or learning spaces which are only available onsite, but the order of return will vary legitimately from provider to provider." Universities should “identify and prioritise for an early return those students who would be most disadvantaged by virtual learning,” it said. Its paper also recommends that science students who need specialist equipment should be allowed to return to campus first. The QAA raised concerns that take-home exams could bring providers into conflict with PSRB requirements, which are used by external agencies to accredit university courses. "There has been a lot of attention paid to how a move to offsite, ‘open book’ exams could expose courses to cheating impersonation,” the guidance said. #Best voice recognition software police softwareVoice recognition software could be used to log into an exam paper and prove a candidate’s identity, or authenticate them for an oral exam. ![]() #Best voice recognition software police passwordIn a new guidance document for universities, the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) recommends institutions use “remotely-supervised activities, password protected or voice recognition software, online or telephone questioning, or third-party verification” to make sure students do not ask others to sit the exams for them. It is thought that assessments in the next academic year will be affected by the virus, with almost all universities adopting a “blended learning” approach, which combines in-person tuition and online lectures.Įxams are expected to be taken online and at home in many cases, leading to concerns that students will be more easily able to cheat. The UK’s higher education watchdog has recommended universities take extra precautions to stop students cheating in take-home exams during the coronavirus pandemic. ![]() The American Civil Liberties Union, a long-time opponent of facial recognition technology, issued a statement on Twitter addressing Microsoft’s decision and demanding that “Congress and legislatures nationwide (.) immediately put a pause on law enforcement use of this technology”.Fears of students cheating in at-home exams could see universities introducing voice recognition software to monitor candidates at home, it has emerged. #Best voice recognition software police seriesThe decision from the three tech giants, who all decided to ban or pause the sales of facial recognition in the last few days, comes two weeks after the alleged murder of George Floyd. The incident sparked a series of protests in the US and other countries, with citizens demanding the end of police brutality and racism. "So I’m not saying that there are no police cases that would meet appropriate standards but, especially with the body cam, cameras relatively low resolution and variable lighting circumstances." "If you've got a well-lit area with a high definition camera, where you can get good photographs, systems can be accurate," said Frank. However, Frank added at the time that the decision did not necessarily rule out future deals with police forces. In that instance, it was argued that the poor quality of police cameras, as well as the likelihood the technology would be used in low light conditions, meant that facial recognition would likely produce a high error rate. ![]() #Best voice recognition software police proIn March, John Frank, Microsoft's vice president of EU Government Affairs, revealed to IT Pro that the company had previously rejected an application from an unnamed US police that sought to use facial recognition technology in its body-mounted cameras. Smith added that Microsoft will consider using facial recognition in “other scenarios”. Given that, we’ve decided that we will not sell facial recognition technology to police departments in the United States until we have a national law in place, grounded in human rights, that will govern this technology.” “But I do think this is a moment in time that really calls on us to listen more, to learn more and most importantly to do more. “As a result of the principles that we’ve put in place, we do not sell facial recognition technology to police departments in the United States today,” he said. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |